Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 is better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, having a 79.8 score against 72.2. Motorola Moto Z4 is an older device than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but it's way thinner and notably lighter anyway. Both devices we are comparing here come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features just a little better performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Moto Z4 features a way better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z4 also has a much better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a little bit better memory to install games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.