Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, having a global score of 84.9 against 72.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A80 is older than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, it's design is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter. The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features much more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 22% more battery capacity. Galaxy A80 features a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.