Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, having an 85.5 score against 72.2. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is extremely lighter and incredibly thinner than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, even though it was released 2 years before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better display than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2246 resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 768 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little faster CPU than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, a way less mega pixels back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.