Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.39 x 2.78 x 0.55 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.06 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.9 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 504 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket has a general score of 71.5, which is way better than the Kyocera DuraForce's 57.9 general score. The Galaxy S III Cricket construction is notably lighter and notably thinner than Kyocera DuraForce. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version while Kyocera DuraForce has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Kyocera DuraForce counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1280 x 720, the Kyocera DuraForce also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen. Kyocera DuraForce counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the Kyocera DuraForce also has a faster graphics processor running at 450 MHz and a higher number of cores (but slower).
Galaxy S III Cricket has a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce. Both of them have the same video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 video definition and a 8 mega pixels camera in the back. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a superior memory to install games and applications than Kyocera DuraForce, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 64 GB and 16 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Kyocera DuraForce features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 3100mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket and the Kyocera DuraForce cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.