Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Samsung |
| Android 2.3, 2.2 | -- |
| 2011-02-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.53 x 2.22 x 0.68 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8650 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1370mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is way better than the Kyocera Echo's 43.8 global score. Galaxy A50 is a incredibly newer device, and it's also lighter and notably thinner than the Kyocera Echo. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot better hardware performance than Kyocera Echo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Galaxy A50 has a better screen than Kyocera Echo, because it has a much better pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Kyocera Echo, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Kyocera Echo, because it has a lot higher (Full HD) video definition and a way higher 25 megapixels resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery duration than Kyocera Echo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 1370mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than Kyocera Echo, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.