Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
for America| Global Score | |
| 52 | 56.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 |
| 2015-07-22 | 2014-05-13 |
| 5.66 x 2.85 x 0.42 inches | 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.01 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 220 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.9 | 4.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 600 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E is a little bit better than Kyocera Hydro Wave, having a score of 56.9 against 52. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto E has older 4.4.4 version and Kyocera Hydro Wave has Android 5.1 version. The Motorola Moto E is an older and thicker cellphone than the Kyocera Hydro Wave, but Motorola was able to build it just a little lighter anyway.
The Motorola Moto E features a little bit better screen than Kyocera Hydro Wave, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 960 x 540 resolution, the Motorola Moto E also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto E has a bit better processing unit than Kyocera Hydro Wave, and although they both have 1 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto E also has a graphics processor and 1 more 1.2 gigahertz cpu cores.
The Kyocera Hydro Wave features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 32 GB, the Kyocera Hydro Wave also has 8 GB internal storage capacity. The Kyocera Hydro Wave counts with a very superior camera than Moto E. Both of them have the same resolution back-facing camera.
Kyocera Hydro Wave features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto E, because it has a 2300mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Moto E is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.