Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.1 | 51.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | ZTE |
| Android 4.1 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2013-05-21 | 2017-09-19 |
| 4.88 x 2.52 x 0.42 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.00 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 233 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| -- | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 12.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 1.36 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo X is just a bit better than Kyocera Hydro XTRM, getting a 51.7 score against 47.1. Even though ZTE Tempo X is just a little heavier than Kyocera Hydro XTRM, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Tempo X has newer 7.1 Nougat version and Kyocera Hydro XTRM has Android 4.1.
The ZTE Tempo X counts with a little better processing power than Kyocera Hydro XTRM, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 2 more cores (but slower). Kyocera Hydro XTRM has a much better looking screen than ZTE Tempo X, because although it has a bit lower 800 x 480 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixels number per inch of screen.
The Kyocera Hydro XTRM and the ZTE Tempo X both count with incredibly similar cameras, both have a 5 MP resolution camera. The ZTE Tempo X has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Kyocera Hydro XTRM, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo X also has 8 GB internal memory.
ZTE Tempo X has a superior battery life than Kyocera Hydro XTRM.
ZTE Tempo X is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.