Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.7 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Latte | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 3.50 x 1.45 x 0.90 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| -- | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 188 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
Comparison review
The Cricket CAPTR has a score of 27.9, which is just a bit better than the Latte Boom's 27.7 overall score. The Latte Boom has a brighter display than Cricket CAPTR, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixels density and a higher 220 x 176 resolution.
Cricket CAPTR's processor is very similar to the CPU in Latte Boom, they have 0 CPU cores. Cricket CAPTR counts with as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the Latte Boom one, although the Cricket CAPTR has no SD card slot. Cricket CAPTR counts with a very superior battery life than Latte Boom.
The Latte Boom captures a lot better photographs and videos than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Cricket CAPTR and the Latte Boom cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.