Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 39.7 | 43.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | HTC |
| Android 2.3.5 | Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 |
| -- | 2008-09-10 |
| 4.54 x 2.44 x 0.46 inches | 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.71 inches |
| -- | 5.30 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| 165 pixels per inch | 286 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Resistive |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Single-Core 528 MHz processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 288 MB RAM |
| Yes GPU | GPU |
| 7.29 | 6.66 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.6 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| 4.73 | 5.06 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 3.1 | 2.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1340mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time |
| 3.04 | 3.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC Touch Pro CDMA is a bit better than LAVA Iris 351, getting a global score of 43.3 against 39.7. HTC Touch Pro CDMA has Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 operating system, while LAVA Iris 351 has Android 2.3.5 operating system. HTC Touch Pro CDMA counts with just a bit better display than LAVA Iris 351, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 640 x 480 resolution.
LAVA Iris 351 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC Touch Pro CDMA. LAVA Iris 351 features a little faster CPU than HTC Touch Pro CDMA, although it has 32 MB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Single-Core processing unit. The HTC Touch Pro CDMA has a battery life that is just as good as the battery lifetime in LAVA Iris 351, although the HTC Touch Pro CDMA also has a 1340mAh battery size.
HTC Touch Pro CDMA has just a bit better camera than LAVA Iris 351, because it has a way better resolution camera in the back.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the HTC Touch Pro CDMA is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.