Search


Compare phones

Global Score
39.943.3
Basic Information
LavaHTC
Android 2.3Windows Mobile Professional 6.1
--2008-09-10
4.53 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches4.17 x 2.05 x 0.71 inches
--5.30 ounces
Gray and White--
$ 155.00$ 120.00
Display / Screen
3.5 inches2.8 inches
320 x 480 pixels 480 x 640 pixels (VGA)
--TFT
165 pixels per inch286 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchResistive
6.77
Single-Core 1000 MHz processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
256 MB RAM288 MB RAM
Yes GPU GPU
7.296.66
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.320
Camera
2.00 MP + 0.30 MP3.20 MP
5.175.06
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile Hotspot--
EDGE, GPRS and GSMEV-DO A and CDMA
SIM, Dual SIM--
3.42.6
Battery Life
1400mAh Li-Ion Battery1340mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
620 hours standby time
7.8 hours talk time
350 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
3.123.04
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Proximity SensorAccelerometer
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The HTC Touch Pro CDMA is a little bit better than LAVA Iris 355, having a 43.3 score against 39.9. HTC Touch Pro CDMA comes with Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 operating system, while LAVA Iris 355 works with Android 2.3 operating system. The HTC Touch Pro CDMA counts with a bit more vivid display than LAVA Iris 355, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way better 640 x 480 resolution and a way higher screen density.

LAVA Iris 355 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC Touch Pro CDMA. LAVA Iris 355 has a bit better CPU than HTC Touch Pro CDMA, although it has 32 MB lesser RAM, they both have 1 CPU cores. LAVA Iris 355 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than HTC Touch Pro CDMA, although it has a much less mega-pixels back facing camera.

LAVA Iris 355 features a bit better battery duration than HTC Touch Pro CDMA, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size.

HTC Touch Pro CDMA not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.