Compare phones
HTC HD7
T9292| Global Score | |
| 48.2 | 52.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | HTC |
| Android 4.4 | Windows Phone 7.5 Mango |
| -- | 2010-10-11 |
| 4.88 x 2.54 x 0.41 inches | 4.80 x 2.68 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 180.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| -- | LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 576 MB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 7.47 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1230mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 310 hours standby time 6.3 hours talk time |
| 3.52 | 2.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC HD7 has an overall score of 52.9, which is a little bit better than LAVA Iris 406Q's overall score of 48.2. HTC HD7 has Windows Phone 7.5 Mango operating system, and LAVA Iris 406Q has Android 4.4 operating system. The LAVA Iris 406Q counts with a brighter screen than HTC HD7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 800 x 480px, the LAVA Iris 406Q also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
HTC HD7 counts with a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LAVA Iris 406Q, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. LAVA Iris 406Q has a superior CPU than HTC HD7, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster), a much better graphics co-processor running at 400 MHz and more RAM.
LAVA Iris 406Q takes a little bit better videos and photos than HTC HD7. Both have the same (HD) video definition, the same video frame rates and a 5 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back. The LAVA Iris 406Q features a way better battery lifetime than HTC HD7, because it has 1700mAh of battery capacity against 1230mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the HTC HD7 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.