Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 48.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.12 x 2.56 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is much better than the LAVA Iris 460's 48.6 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has a newer 5.0 version while LAVA Iris 460 has Android 4.4.2 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a sharper screen than LAVA Iris 460, because it has a way greater screen pixels density, a much higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a larger screen. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more powerful processor than LAVA Iris 460, because it has a higher amount of RAM, 6 more processing cores and a much better graphics processor working at 600 megahertz.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than LAVA Iris 460, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB and 56 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a greater camera than LAVA Iris 460, because it has a camera in the back with a much better 13 mega pixels resolution and a way better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better battery performance than LAVA Iris 460, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the LAVA Iris 460, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.