Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | LG |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 500 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the LAVA Iris 550Q, with a general score of 83.7 against 51.7. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version while LAVA Iris 550Q has Android 4.2 version. LG V50 ThinQ is a thinner but a bit heavier cellphone than LAVA Iris 550Q.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior hardware performance than LAVA Iris 550Q, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than LAVA Iris 550Q, because it has a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a way better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a bigger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes way better photos and videos than LAVA Iris 550Q, because it has a much higher resolution back camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition. The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than LAVA Iris 550Q, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 124 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a way better battery performance than LAVA Iris 550Q, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also the cheapest, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.