Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 48 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.55 x 2.81 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 22.7 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 80.7, which is way better than LAVA Iris alfa's global score of 48. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version while LAVA Iris alfa has Android 4.4 version. Galaxy Note 3 is a a little thinner but a little heavier phone than LAVA Iris alfa.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a superior processor than LAVA Iris alfa, because it has 4 more processing cores, a graphics processor and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a brighter display than LAVA Iris alfa, because it has a lot better pixel number per display inch, a way better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better camera than LAVA Iris alfa, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera and a lot higher (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LAVA Iris alfa, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds up to 64 GB.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much longer battery life than LAVA Iris alfa, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2200mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.