Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 39.6 | 43.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | HTC |
| Android 2.3.6 | Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 |
| -- | 2008-09-10 |
| 2.38 x 4.41 x 0.49 inches | 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.71 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 5.30 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 125 pixels per inch | 286 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Resistive |
| 6.2 | 7 |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Single-Core 528 MHz processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 288 MB RAM |
| Yes GPU | GPU |
| 7.29 | 6.66 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.92 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| 4.73 | 5.06 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 2.8 | 2.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1340mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 3.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The HTC Touch Pro CDMA has an overall score of 43.3, which is a little bit better than the LAVA Iris N320's score of 39.6. HTC Touch Pro CDMA is a a lot thicker and way heavier phone than LAVA Iris N320. HTC Touch Pro CDMA has Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 OS, while LAVA Iris N320 comes with Android 2.3.6 OS.
The HTC Touch Pro CDMA features a more vivid display than LAVA Iris N320, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 640 x 480 and a way better number of pixels per screen inch. The LAVA Iris N320 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than HTC Touch Pro CDMA.
LAVA Iris N320 has just a little better processing power than HTC Touch Pro CDMA, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LAVA Iris N320 counts with just a little better battery duration than HTC Touch Pro CDMA, because it has a 1400mAh battery size against 1340mAh.
The HTC Touch Pro CDMA features just a bit better camera than LAVA Iris N320, because it has a camera in the back with much more MP.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the HTC Touch Pro CDMA is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.