Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | LG |
| Android 4.2.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.43 x 2.66 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 234 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 400 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is way better than LAVA Iris Pro 20's overall score of 49.8. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while LAVA Iris Pro 20 has Android 4.2.1. Even being the best in this comparison review, the LG V50 ThinQ body is extremely heavier and just a little thicker than the LAVA Iris Pro 20.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because it has a lot greater screen pixels density, a lot higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a really bigger display. The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a quite better performance than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 5 GB more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior battery life than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better camera than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much higher 12 MP resolution back-facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the LAVA Iris Pro 20, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.