Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.43 x 2.63 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 400 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the LAVA Iris Pro 30, having a overall score of 83.7 against 50.1. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while LAVA Iris Pro 30 has Android 4.2.2. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is a bit thicker and way heavier than the LAVA Iris Pro 30.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a greater processing power than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has a much better pixel count per inch of display, a really bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage to install games and applications than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 124 GB more internal memory capacity. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery performance than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots way better pictures and videos than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has a lot higher 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also the cheapest, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.