Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50 | 57.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | ZTE |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| -- | 2017-07-14 |
| 5.28 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.12 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 218 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 6.93 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.9 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Blade Spark has an overall score of 57.4, which is better than the LAVA Iris X1's global score of 50. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the ZTE Blade Spark has newer 7.1 Nougat version while LAVA Iris X1 has Android 4.4.2, giving a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. Even being the best device we are comparing here, the ZTE Blade Spark body is a bit thicker and notably heavier than LAVA Iris X1.
The LAVA Iris X1 has a slightly better screen than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, a bit smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 854 x 480px. ZTE Blade Spark has just a bit better processing power than LAVA Iris X1, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, and they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Blade Spark also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
LAVA Iris X1 captures slightly better videos and photos than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a lower video resolution and a lot less mega pixels camera. ZTE Blade Spark features much more storage capacity for games and applications than LAVA Iris X1, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 128 GB and 16 GB internal storage.
The ZTE Blade Spark has a way better battery life than LAVA Iris X1, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
The ZTE Blade Spark is a bit more expensive than LAVA Iris X1, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.