Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 291 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is way better than LAVA Iris X8's global score of 54.2. LG V50 ThinQ's design is just a little bit thinner but heavier than LAVA Iris X8. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while LAVA Iris X8 has Android 4.4.2.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a faster processing unit than LAVA Iris X8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better display than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a larger screen, a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a much greater pixel quantity per display inch.
LG V50 ThinQ captures a lot better photographs and videos than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LAVA Iris X8, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a really longer battery performance than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.