Compare phones
Motorola Moto X
16 GB| Global Score | |
| 62 | 68.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lenovo | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2016-07-01 | 2013-08-01 |
| 6.89 x 3.52 x 0.38 inches | 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 145.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 229 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT8735 chipset | Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T720 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto X has a global score of 68.1, which is a bit better than the Lenovo Phab 2's 62 overall score. The Motorola Moto X is a incredibly older and just a little bit thicker device than the Lenovo Phab 2, but Motorola was able to build it way lighter anyway. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but the Motorola Moto X has 4.4.4 version and Lenovo Phab 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Motorola Moto X has a much sharper screen than Lenovo Phab 2, because although it has a really smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, the Motorola Moto X also counts with a greater display pixel density. The Lenovo Phab 2 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Moto X features a bit faster processing unit than Lenovo Phab 2, because although it has a lower number of cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Lenovo Phab 2 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
The Motorola Moto X takes much better photos and videos than Lenovo Phab 2, although it has a lot worse 10 MP resolution back-facing camera and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video.
The Moto X is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.