Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.4 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| -- | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 3.39 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 165 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.6 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | CDMA |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
Comparison review
LG 221C has a general score of 28.4, which is a little bit better than the Cricket CAPTR's global score of 27.9. The LG 221C is a a lot thinner but heavier phone than Cricket CAPTR. The LG 221C counts with a little more vivid screen than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a better pixels quantity per inch of display.
Cricket CAPTR has a processing unit that's very similar to the LG 221C one, both of them have 0 cpu cores. Cricket CAPTR captures much better videos and photos than LG 221C. The Cricket CAPTR counts with as much memory capacity for apps and games as LG 221C. Cricket CAPTR features a very superior battery life than LG 221C.
The LG 221C and the Cricket CAPTR cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.