Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.538.4
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--2009-03-10
3.58 x 1.89 x 0.71 inches4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches
3.20 ounces3.25 ounces
Black--
$ 85.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
1.7 inches3 inches
--240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
235 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.45.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
262,14 MB internal memory51,2 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.80.4
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.515.39
EDGE, GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.40.3
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
192 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
800 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
2.42.56
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1
--Accelerometer
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Samsung Star is a bit better than LG 430G, with a score of 38.4 against 35.5. The Samsung Star is a a little bit heavier but a lot thinner device than the LG 430G. The Samsung Star has a processor that's just as good as the LG 430G one, both have a 0-Core CPU. The LG 430G features a slightly better screen than Samsung Star, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a much better display density.

The LG 430G has a much greater memory for apps and games than Samsung Star, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 210,94 MB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Star counts with just a little better battery lifetime than LG 430G, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity instead of 900mAh.

The Samsung Star has a much better camera than LG 430G, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels.

The Samsung Star not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.