Search


Compare phones

Samsung Star

GT-S5230
Global Score
35.138.4
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--2009-03-10
3.86 x 2.01 x 0.73 inches4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches
3.63 ounces3.25 ounces
$ 139.99$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches3 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.65.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
262,14 MB internal memory51,2 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.80.4
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.515.39
HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
10.3
Battery Life
950mAh Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
800 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
2.482.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1
--Accelerometer
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Samsung Star is a little bit better than LG 450, with a score of 38.4 against 35.1. The Samsung Star design is much thinner and somewhat lighter than LG 450. Samsung Star's processor is just as good as the LG 450 one, both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Star features a little more vivid display than LG 450, because it has a way higher resolution of 400 x 240 pixels, a little greater number of pixels per display inch and a lot bigger screen.

The LG 450 features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Star, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 262,14 MB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Star has a better camera than LG 450, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution.

Samsung Star features just a little bit longer battery duration than LG 450, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Star is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.