Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 30.6 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.40 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 3.30 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution | -- |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| -- | CDMA |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 151 hours standby time 3.8 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
Comparison review
LG 530G is slightly better than the Cricket CAPTR, getting a general score of 30.6 against 27.9. The LG 530G is a much thinner but heavier phone than the Cricket CAPTR. The Cricket CAPTR features an incredibly better screen than LG 530G. The LG 530G features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 32 GB.
Cricket CAPTR counts with a processor that's just as good as the LG 530G one, both of them have 0 cores. The LG 530G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a way better resolution camera. The Cricket CAPTR has a really longer battery life than LG 530G.
The LG 530G and the Cricket CAPTR cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.