Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.837.9
Basic Information
LGNokia
--Symbian 9.3
--2008-04-22
4.28 x 1.83 x 0.54 inches4.25 x 1.81 x 0.59 inches
2.77 ounces3.17 ounces
$ 230.00$ 115.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.36.6
processorARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.3
Storage
25,6 MB internal memory143,36 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.060.7
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.515.06
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIM, Dual SIMSIM
0.30.9
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery890mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--250 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
2.482.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Nokia 5320 XpressMusic is just a bit better than LG A230, getting a global score of 37.9 against 34.8. Nokia 5320 XpressMusic's body is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG A230. The Nokia 5320 XpressMusic has a much more vibrant screen than LG A230, because it has a much higher 320 x 240 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a much greater pixels count per inch in the screen.

LG A230 features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Nokia 5320 XpressMusic, although it has less internal memory. Nokia 5320 XpressMusic has a bit better performance than LG A230, because it has 1 more CPU cores. Nokia 5320 XpressMusic counts with a better camera than LG A230, because it has a way better resolution camera.

LG A230 has a bit superior battery life than Nokia 5320 XpressMusic, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity.

Nokia 5320 XpressMusic is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.