Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.1 | 35.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | 2008-10-21 |
| 4.22 x 1.77 x 0.56 inches | 3.81 x 1.87 x 0.73 inches |
| 2.32 ounces | 4.97 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 2299.00 | $ 2269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.4 inches | 1.6 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | -- |
| TFT | LCD |
| 129 pixels per inch | 115 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 5.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.44 | 1.9 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 810mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 400 hours standby time 7.3 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
Comparison review
Motorola AURA has an overall score of 35.3, which is much better than the LG A270's 29.1 global score. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Motorola AURA's body is incredibly thicker and noticeably heavier than LG A270. The Motorola AURA has a processing unit that's just as good as the LG A270 one, both of them have a 0-Core CPU.
The Motorola AURA has just a bit better looking screen than LG A270, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Motorola AURA counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than LG A270, although it has no external memory slot.
Motorola AURA shoots way better pictures and videos than LG A270. The LG A270 has improved battery life than Motorola AURA, because it has 950mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola AURA is also cheaper, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.