Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.436.8
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--2009-08-06
4.47 x 2.01 x 0.51 inches3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches
3.14 ounces3.50 ounces
$ 99.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.6 inches
176 x 220 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
128 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.35.9
MTK6253 (Single-Core 104 MHz) processor processor
128 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.225.76
microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.440
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM, Dual SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
1500mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
6 hours talk time
3.282.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0
--GPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Samsung Reclaim has a score of 36.8, which is slightly better than the LG A290's global score of 34.4. The Samsung Reclaim is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the LG A290. Samsung Reclaim has a quite superior hardware performance than LG A290, although it has less and slower cores.

The Samsung Reclaim counts with a much better looking screen than LG A290, because it has a bigger display, a higher 240 x 320 resolution and a just a little better display pixels density. The Samsung Reclaim features just a bit better camera than LG A290, because it has a lot higher resolution camera.

The LG A290 has a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung Reclaim. LG A290 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Reclaim, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity instead of 1000mAh.

Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Reclaim is also the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.