Search


Compare phones

Global Score
37.842.3
Basic Information
LGHTC
--Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
--2009-06-25
4.02 x 2.05 x 0.67 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
3.56 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
167 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86
Performance
Qualcomm QSC6270E chipset--
Single-Core 230 MHz processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
128 MB RAM192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.856.66
Storage
262,14 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
2.120
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution--
4.514.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
1.12.9
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
261 hours standby time
3.4 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.43.28
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

HTC Ozone has a global score of 42.3, which is better than the LG A380's 37.8 overall score. HTC Ozone's body is a little bit heavier but much thinner than LG A380. The HTC Ozone has a quite superior hardware performance than LG A380, and although they both have a Single-Core processing unit, the HTC Ozone also has 64 MB more RAM memory.

The HTC Ozone has just a bit better looking display than LG A380. They have a display of the same size, exactly the same 240 x 320 pixels resolution and the same number of pixels per display inch. The LG A380 features much more storage for games and applications than HTC Ozone. HTC Ozone takes clearer photographs and videos than LG A380, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.

HTC Ozone counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG A380, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.

The HTC Ozone and the LG A380 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.