| Global Score | |
| 36.5 | 40 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | 2008-09-29 |
| 3.58 x 2.48 x 0.63 inches | 4.25 x 2.15 x 0.54 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 4.27 ounces |
| $ 845.00 | $ 470.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.5 inches | 3.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 160 pixels per inch | 146 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 5.9 | 5.8 |
| processor | processor |
| 128 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 204,8 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 0.8 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| -- | 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 6.38 |
| EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 290 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | Accelerometer |
Samsung Pixon is just a bit better than the LG C320, with a 40 score against 36.5. Samsung Pixon is a somewhat thinner but just a little heavier phone than the LG C320. The LG C320 and the Samsung Pixon have very similar CPUs, although the Samsung Pixon has 1 lesser megahertz cpu cores. LG C320 has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Pixon, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse 240 x 320 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Pixon counts with a greater camera than LG C320, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution. LG C320 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Pixon. The Samsung Pixon features just a bit longer battery life than LG C320, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Pixon not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.