Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 36.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.87 x 1.94 x 0.64 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.36 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.4 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 350 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is much better than the LG Chocolate 3, with a 71.5 score against 36.2. The Galaxy S III Cricket body is heavier but noticeably thinner than the LG Chocolate 3. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a much better looking display than LG Chocolate 3, because it has a much bigger screen, a lot higher 1280 x 720 pixels resolution and a lot better pixels count per inch of display.
The Galaxy S III Cricket features a really superior performance than LG Chocolate 3, because it has a graphics processing unit and a higher number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than LG Chocolate 3, because it has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a way better battery duration than LG Chocolate 3, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket shoots way better videos and photos than LG Chocolate 3, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution.
The Galaxy S III Cricket and the LG Chocolate 3 cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.