Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.237.9
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--2010-06-23
3.87 x 1.94 x 0.64 inches4.60 x 2.11 x 0.60 inches
3.36 ounces4.34 ounces
$ 100.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches--
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.15.8
processor Single-Core 184 MHz processor
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
1 GB internal memory71,68 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
1.41.5
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution--
4.734.73
CDMAHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.9
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

Samsung Gravity 3 has a general score of 37.9, which is a bit better than the LG Chocolate 3's 36.2 general score. Samsung Gravity 3 is a just a little bit thinner but noticeably heavier phone than LG Chocolate 3. The LG Chocolate 3 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Gravity 3, and although they both have the same exact 320 x 240 resolution, the LG Chocolate 3 also has more pixels per inch of screen.

The Samsung Gravity 3 has a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than LG Chocolate 3, although it has 0 less internal memory capacity. The LG Chocolate 3 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Gravity 3, although it has 1 less and slower cores. Samsung Gravity 3 counts with improved battery lifetime than LG Chocolate 3, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.

The Samsung Gravity 3 and LG Chocolate 3 feature extremely similar cameras, both have the same resolution camera.

Samsung Gravity 3 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.