Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than LG G Flex 2, having an 80.3 score against 75.2. Google Nexus 6P is a newer and way thinner phone than the LG G Flex 2, but it's somewhat heavier. LG G Flex 2 counts with a little more vivid display than Google Nexus 6P, although it has a little smaller screen, a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a bit less pixels per screen inch.
Google Nexus 6P counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The LG G Flex 2 has a bit more powerful processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores and a 3 GB RAM memory, the LG G Flex 2 also has an extra GPU and a 64-bit CPU.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 12.3 MP resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video definition. Google Nexus 6P counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G Flex 2, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.