Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 overall score. The Google Pixel 2 is a much newer phone, and it is also thinner and just a bit lighter than the LG G Flex 2. LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. LG G Flex 2 features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64 bits processing unit.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 shoots much better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a lower 12.2 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.