Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than LG G Flex 2's general score of 75.2. The Google Pixel XL design is newer and a bit thinner than the LG G Flex 2's, although it's also a little heavier. LG G Flex 2 has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, although it has a quite worse pixel amount per inch of display and a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
The LG G Flex 2 has a quite superior hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a GPU, a 64-bits processor and a higher number of cores. The Google Pixel XL counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel XL counts with a little longer battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 3450mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Google Pixel XL takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower video resolution and a camera with a worse resolution.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG G Flex 2, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.