| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gray and Red | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
HTC U Ultra is slightly better than LG G Flex 2, having a 77 score against 75.2. The HTC U Ultra design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than LG G Flex 2's, but it is somewhat heavier. LG G Flex 2 features just a bit better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit worse pixel density and a quite smaller screen.
The LG G Flex 2 features a better performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor, a GPU and a greater number of cores (although they are slower). The HTC U Ultra has much more memory to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a worse video definition. HTC U Ultra's battery lifetime is just as good as LG G Flex 2's battery lifetime.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the LG G Flex 2, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.