Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 global score. Moto G Stylus is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner device than LG G Flex 2, although it's extremely heavier. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Stylus has 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a much better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processor and a graphics co-processor. The Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a way more MP camera.
The Moto G Stylus counts with greater battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G Flex 2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.