Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android |
| 2015-01-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A32 is incredibly heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's just a little bit thinner and incredibly newer. Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 operating system.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a GPU. LG G Flex 2 features a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each display inch and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a lot better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A32 has a much better battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.