Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has a global score of 82.3, which is a bit better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 overall score. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A60 has newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0. The Galaxy A60 construction is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than LG G Flex 2's, but it's just a bit heavier.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a graphics processing unit. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A60, although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a little bit worse pixel density and a little smaller display.
The Galaxy A60 counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a little longer battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A60 has a better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A60 also has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.