Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is much better than the LG G Flex 2, with a global score of 84.9 against 75.2. The Galaxy A80 design has the same thickness than LG G Flex 2, but it's a lot heavier. LG G Flex 2 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The LG G Flex 2 features a little better processing power than Galaxy A80, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an additional graphics co-processor.
Galaxy A80 features greater battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a back facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.