Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is better than LG G Flex 2, getting an 83.3 score against 75.2. Even though the Galaxy M30s is somewhat heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's just a little bit thinner and extremely newer. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M30s has the newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, giving you a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, although it has a bit worse display pixel density, a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite smaller screen. The Galaxy M30s counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra GPU. The Galaxy M30s features a greater camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M30s also has a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.