Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a more recent 5.1 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0. Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ and the LG G Flex 2 were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s design is a little bit heavier but thinner.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a bit sharper screen than LG G Flex 2, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a little bit larger display and a greater screen pixel density. LG G Flex 2 has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
LG G Flex 2 has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit, a 64 bits CPU and more processing cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ and LG G Flex 2 both feature really similar battery durations.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a better 16 mega pixels resolution camera.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG G Flex 2, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.