Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than LG G Flex 2, with a 77.8 score against 75.2. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a newer and way thinner cellphone than the LG G Flex 2, although it is also notably heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the newer 14 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, so it provides you a lot of extra features and better performance.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a brighter display than LG G Flex 2, because it has a much bigger screen, a much higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. LG G Flex 2 counts with a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processor and a GPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than LG G Flex 2, because it has a way higher video definition and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the LG G Flex 2, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.