Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is much better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 overall score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner device than the LG G Flex 2, but it's also heavier. LG G Flex 2 features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it has a little smaller display, a quite inferior pixels number per screen inch and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB. The LG G Flex 2 has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes much clearer photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features improved battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Flex 2. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG G Flex 2, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.