Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the LG G Pro 2's global score of 74.8. Although Google Nexus 6P is just a little heavier than LG G Pro 2, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. LG G Pro 2 features just a bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with an extra GPU.
LG G Pro 2 has a little sharper display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lot worse pixels density and a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display. Google Nexus 6P shoots slightly better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Pro 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, else you can save some money and buy the LG G Pro 2, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.