Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than LG G Pro 2, having a score of 81.6 against 74.8. Google Pixel 2 is a way newer phone, and it's also a bit thinner and lighter than LG G Pro 2. Google Pixel 2 and LG G Pro 2 have extremely similar processors, because although the Google Pixel 2 has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores.
The LG G Pro 2 features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little lower screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with a bigger display. The Google Pixel 2 has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a larger back camera sensor.
LG G Pro 2 features better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.