Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 global score. Google Pixel XL's construction is incredibly newer and a little lighter, but also a little bit thicker than the LG G Pro 2. LG G Pro 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a much worse pixels quantity per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The LG G Pro 2 has a little better performance than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Google Pixel XL has a slightly better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images.
Google Pixel XL counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel XL counts with just a little better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Pro 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, else you can save some money and buy the LG G Pro 2, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.