Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has an overall score of 77, which is slightly better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. LG V20's body is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner than the LG G Pro 2's, but it's also a little heavier. LG G Pro 2 counts with a slightly better looking display than LG V20, because although it has a much worse number of pixels per inch of screen and a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
LG V20 features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG G Pro 2 has just a little better processing power than LG V20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 4 processing cores, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with an extra GPU.
The LG V20 and LG G Pro 2 count with really similar battery durations. LG V20 has just a bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG V20 also has a more megapixels camera in the back, a lot larger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, LG V20 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.