Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the LG G Pro 2, having an 83.7 score against 74.8. LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little heavier phone than the LG G Pro 2, but both of them are equally thin. These phones have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ has a screen that is just as good as the LG G Pro 2 one, although the LG V50 ThinQ also has a quite bigger screen, a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ has improved battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.