Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is a bit better than LG G Pro 2's score of 74.8. Even being the best phone in this comparison, we must highlight that it is also extremely thicker and just a bit heavier. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid screen than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better performance than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have a Quad-Core CPU and a 3 GB RAM memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a faster graphics co-processor working at 500 MHz.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo has improved battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 22 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a slightly better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.