Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than LG G Pro 2, having an 81.2 score against 74.8. The Motorola Edge 50 body is way newer and just a little thinner, but a little bit heavier than LG G Pro 2. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better screen than LG G Pro 2, because it has a better resolution of 1220 x 2712, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher screen pixel density. The LG G Pro 2 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a GPU.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 has a way better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 has a much better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger aperture to take better low light images and videos and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.